Case 1400929/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Shotton v Saint Gobain Building Distribution Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400929/2020
- Decision date
- 3 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Date
- Panel members
- Ms R Goddard, Ms R Clarke
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Shotton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claimant's claims at Bristol by video on 19 to 21 May 2021 before Employment Judge C H O'Rourke, sitting with members Ms R Goddard and Ms R Clarke. The written judgment records claims of automatic unfair dismissal, victimisation and harassment on grounds of sex.
The judgment states that the claims failed and were dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not set out detailed findings, legal analysis, or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records this as a claim of automatic unfair dismissal but does not specify the asserted automatic reason in the written text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment describes the victimisation claim as being on grounds of sex and states that it failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The judgment describes the harassment claim as being on grounds of sex and states that it failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.