Case 1401076/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Martin Jackson, Citizens’ Advice Cornwall For the First v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401076/2020
- Decision date
- 20 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr Martin Jackson, Citizens’ Advice Cornwall For the First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a collective protective award claim brought by Mr J Pearce and 44 others against Fifteen Cornwall Limited. The tribunal found that Fifteen employed 56 people at the Watergate Bay restaurant and that, at a meeting on 12 December 2019, the claimants were told that the business had ceased trading with immediate effect and that all staff were to be made redundant immediately, save for a small number retained only until 19 December 2019. The tribunal also found that there was no independent recognised trade union and no staff association or other elected employee representative body.
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to undertake any, or any adequate, consultation with the claimants before dismissal. Applying section 188 TULRCA, it concluded that the second respondent failed to comply with the statutory requirement to consult about the proposed redundancies, and that the complaint was well founded. It therefore made a protective award for employees dismissed as redundant on or after 12 December 2019 and declared that each such employee was entitled to remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on that date. The extracted judgment does not state a separate monetary total for the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal found the complaint well founded and ordered a 90-day protected period; no separate monetary sum is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.188 TULRCA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.