Case 1401146/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Cordey v Honiton College Academy Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401146/2019
- Decision date
- 5 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goraj Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Cordey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy judgment dated 5 February 2020, Employment Judge Goraj recorded that Mrs C Cordey's complaints of direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability in respect of alleged acts prior to 18 January 2019, failure to make reasonable adjustments in respect of alleged acts prior to 18 January 2019, and harassment related to disability were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment does not contain merits findings on those complaints or any remedy award. It records only the procedural dismissal of those claims after withdrawal.
The tribunal also stated that the claimant's remaining claims would proceed to a hearing on 1, 2 and 3 June 2020.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination complaint dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from a disability, in respect of alleged acts prior to 18 January 2019, dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments, in respect of alleged acts prior to 18 January 2019, dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Complaint of harassment related to disability dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.