Case 1401155/2023 · Employment Tribunal
- IN PERSON FOR THE v Sol Attendance Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401155/2023
- Decision date
- 18 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
- IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Bristol with Employment Judge Cadney sitting alone, recorded that the respondent did not attend. The claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claims were well founded and ordered the respondent to pay specified sums for unpaid wages, accrued but unpaid holiday pay, one month's contractual notice, Statutory Sick Pay, and statutory redundancy pay. The judgment did not set out further factual findings or legal reasoning beyond the awards made.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as unpaid wages, awarded gross. | Upheld | — | £656 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as accrued but unpaid holiday pay, awarded net. | Upheld | — | £294 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as contractual notice of one month, awarded gross. | Upheld | — | £1,184 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as Statutory Sick Pay, awarded net. | Upheld | — | £159 |
| Redundancy | The judgment describes this as statutory redundancy pay. | Upheld | — | £305 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,597
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.