Case 1401368/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Wetherill v John Lewis plc — 2025
- Case reference
- 1401368/2024
- Decision date
- 13 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Wetherill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that, by consent, the Claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded. The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £832.
The Tribunal also recorded that the Claimant had not brought any other claim over which the Tribunal had jurisdiction. To the extent he had brought a claim for damages, defamation, or discrimination, that claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded by consent. | Upheld | — | £832 |
| Other | The judgment states that, to the extent the Claimant brought a claim for damages, defamation, or discrimination, it was dismissed because the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction. The protected characteristic for any discrimination allegation is not identified in the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £832
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.