Case 1401400/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Rullo v Bournemouth Transport Limited (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 1401400/2024
- Decision date
- 30 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr M Rullo
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed Mr Rullo's application for reconsideration of the judgment dated 30 April 2025. The application was considered under the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, including the process for deciding whether there was any reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked.
The judge found that Mr Rullo had previously been given directions to provide a witness statement explaining the factual basis for saying his claims were presented within a reasonable period. Mr Rullo's further explanation for the delay was treated as material that could have been advanced at the trial, and the judge concluded it was not appropriate to reopen the decision.
The tribunal held that there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked, so the reconsideration application was refused. The order noted that the judgment did not prevent Mr Rullo from pursuing a claim against the Secretary of State for a protective award, but whether such a claim would be accepted was not before the tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The text is an order dismissing the claimant's application for reconsideration of the judgment dated 30 April 2025. The underlying claim details and remedy position are not set out in this short reconsideration judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- rule 68 of The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 69 of The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 70 of The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Flint v Eastern Electricity Board [1975] ICR 395
- Outasight VB v Brown [2015] ICR D11
- Ministry of Justice v Burton [2016] ICR 1128
- Newcastle upon Tyne City Council v Marsden [2010] ICR 743
- Lindsay v Ironsides Ray & Vials [1994] ICR 384
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.