Case 1401437/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Catlin v Rac Motoring Services — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401437/2023
- Decision date
- 23 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Catlin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Livesey heard the case at Bristol by video on 27 September 2023. The written judgment records that the Claimant’s complaints under the Equality Act were dismissed because they had been brought out of time and the tribunal was not satisfied that it was just and equitable to extend time under s.123.
The judgment does not determine the remaining complaint of unfair dismissal. It states that the unfair dismissal claim was to proceed in accordance with the Case Management Order made on the same date. No liability finding or remedy is recorded for that claim in this decision.
Because the Equality Act complaints were dismissed on limitation grounds, the judgment records no award of compensation or other remedy. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the Claimant’s Equality Act complaints were dismissed because they were brought out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time under s.123. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.