Case 1401587/2022 · Employment Tribunal
- IN PERSON FOR THE v Sol Attendance Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401587/2022
- Decision date
- 8 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
- IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims for unlawful deduction from wages and unpaid holiday pay. The respondent did not attend the hearing.
The tribunal found both claimant claims well founded and upheld them. It ordered the respondent to pay £320.00 for unlawful deduction from wages and £38.62 for unpaid holiday pay, making a total award of £358.62.
The judgment also dismissed the respondent's counterclaim, without giving further detail about the nature of that counterclaim in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated the unlawful deduction from wages claim was well founded and upheld, and awarded £320.00 for this claim. | Upheld | — | £320 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal stated the unpaid holiday pay claim was well founded and upheld, and awarded £38.62 for this claim. | Upheld | — | £39 |
| Other | The respondent's counterclaim was dismissed; the judgment does not specify the legal basis or subject matter of the counterclaim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £359
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.