Case 1401596/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C King v South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust — 2018
- Case reference
- 1401596/2017
- Decision date
- 9 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Matthews
- Venue
- Exeter
- Panel members
- Mrs S Richards, Mrs E A Uppington
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C King
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal postponed the hearing and relisted the case for hearing before an Employment Judge sitting with members at Exeter from 17 to 21 September 2018. The case was not reserved to the same Tribunal.
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant costs totalling £1,900. The costs comprised the Claimant's travel, a farm management fee for the day of the hearing, solicitors' costs for dealing with the postponement application, Counsel's travel and accommodation, and Counsel's attendance fee. Reasons were given orally, with written reasons available only on request within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only a postponement/relisting and a costs order arising from the Respondent's postponement application. It does not determine the underlying unfair dismissal or sex discrimination claims. | Upheld | — | £1,900 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,900
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.