Case 1401693/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Kelly, Solicitor For the First v Simonstone (Bristol) Ltd (In Administration) and 2 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401693/2020
- Decision date
- 29 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms C Monaghan, Dr J Miller
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr D Kelly, Solicitor For the First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a claim by 13 employees of Simonstone (Bristol) Limited (in administration) for a protective award under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal found that the company lost its FCA franchise on 19 December 2019, told staff to go home early for Christmas on 20 December 2019, and on 2 January 2020 told them there was no chance of the branch reopening and that about 30 employees, including the claimants, were dismissed redundant with immediate effect.
The tribunal found there was no recognised trade union at the business and no employee representatives were elected for collective consultation. It found that the respondent took no steps to elect representatives or to consult with any of the employees between 20 December 2019 and 2 January 2020, and therefore failed to undertake any adequate consultation before the dismissals.
The respondent accepted that it had not consulted at least 30 days before the first dismissals took effect, but relied on section 188(7) and special circumstances arising from the unforeseen and unprecedented situation. The tribunal referred to Clarks of Hove Ltd v The Bakers Union and Shanahan Engineering Ltd v Unite the Union, and held that even if special circumstances existed the employer still had to take all reasonably practicable steps towards compliance. On the evidence, the respondent had taken no such steps, so the special circumstances defence did not apply.
The complaint that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 was therefore well founded, and the tribunal made a protective award for the claimants who were employed at the Bristol premises and dismissed as redundant on or after 2 January 2020. The award covered remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 2 January 2020. The respondent entered administration on 14 January 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under section 188 TULRCA; the tribunal ordered remuneration for the protected period of 90 days beginning on 2 January 2020, but the judgment does not quantify a single monetary sum. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.188 TULRCA
- s.188(7) special circumstances defence
- Clarks of Hove Ltd v The Bakers Union [1978] ICR 1076 CA
- Shanahan Engineering Ltd v Unite the Union EAT 0411/09
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.