Case 1401711/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Natalie Hicks v DHL Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1401711/2024
- Decision date
- 6 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Yallop REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Natalie Hicks
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant did not attend the hearing listed at Southampton by CVP on 9 May 2025. The Respondent had provided witness statements and written submissions to the Tribunal and the Claimant on 8 May 2025.
On the morning of the hearing, the Claimant emailed the Tribunal saying that she would rather not go ahead. The Tribunal telephoned the Claimant, who confirmed that she was withdrawing her claim, and she later confirmed this in writing.
The Tribunal recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the Claimant and dismissed it in accordance with Employment Tribunal Rule 51. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the Claimant withdrew her claim and that it was dismissed in accordance with Employment Tribunal Rule 51. The judgment text does not set out the substance of the claim; the classification follows the listing category supplied in the case context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 51
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.