Case 1401899/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Armelle Tohou v Hampshire County Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401899/2020
- Decision date
- 4 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Cadney Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Armelle Tohou
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was summarily dismissed on 2 December 2019 and presented her claim on 14 April 2020. The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal, holiday pay, disability discrimination and associative disability discrimination claims were all presented outside their primary limitation periods, and that the ACAS early conciliation dates did not extend time because conciliation began after those periods had expired.
For unfair dismissal and holiday pay, the claimant relied on anxiety about her own health, anxiety about her disabled daughter's wellbeing, and lack of support while her husband was abroad. The tribunal accepted that she had those anxieties, but found there was insufficient evidence, including no medical evidence, to show that it had not been reasonably practicable for her to present those claims in time. Those claims were dismissed.
For the disability discrimination claims, the tribunal considered whether it was just and equitable to extend time. It found that the delay was relatively short and that there was no evidence of specific prejudice to the respondent's ability to defend the claims. Although the tribunal accepted there was no good reason for the delay, it concluded that the balance of prejudice favoured extending time, so the disability discrimination and associative disability discrimination claims were allowed to proceed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed at preliminary hearing because it was presented out of time and the tribunal found insufficient evidence that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed at preliminary hearing because it was presented out of time and the tribunal found insufficient evidence that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Time was extended on a just and equitable basis for the claimant's direct disability discrimination claim to proceed to hearing; the merits were not determined. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Time was extended on a just and equitable basis for the claimant's direct associative disability discrimination claim to proceed to hearing; the merits were not determined. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- section 111(1) and (2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 30(2)(a) and (b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 123(1) of the Equality Act 2010
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend-on-Sea BC
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble
- section 33 Limitation Act 1980
- Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.