Case 1401944/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Wilton v Capstick Brothers Limited T/A Fireaway Pizza — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401944/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Members
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Mr H Launder, Ms R Clarke
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Wilton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent contravened section 40 of the Equality Act 2010 and upheld Miss C Wilton's harassment claim in relation to allegation 2.2.3 in the list of issues. It also found a contravention of section 39 of the Equality Act 2010 and upheld her victimisation claim in relation to allegation 3.2.1. The remaining allegations of harassment were dismissed upon withdrawal, and the remaining allegations of victimisation were dismissed.
At remedy, the respondent was ordered to pay the agreed sum of £7,450 to the claimant on or before 2 June 2023. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Succeeded in relation to allegation 2.2.3 in the list of issues. The other allegations of harassment were dismissed upon their withdrawal. The operative paragraph does not identify the protected characteristic. | Upheld | — | — |
| Victimisation | Succeeded in relation to allegation 3.2.1 in the list of issues. The other allegations of victimisation were dismissed. The operative paragraph does not identify the protected characteristic. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,450
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.