Case 1402309/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C London v Blui Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402309/2021
- Decision date
- 22 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C London
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 10 June 2022, Employment Judge Leith recorded that the Respondent, Blui Limited, did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal found that the Respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the Claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £3,745.96 in respect of that deduction.
The tribunal also found that the Respondent had breached the Claimant's contract and ordered payment of £33 as damages for breach of contract. The written record states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no separate written reasons were provided unless requested. The decision was sent to the parties on 22 June 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the gross sum of £3,745.96 in respect of the sum unlawfully deducted. | Upheld | — | £3,746 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract and ordered payment of £33 as damages. | Upheld | — | £33 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,779
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.