Case 1402322/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Harrington v Scrivens Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1402322/2022
- Decision date
- 9 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Scott Tribunal
- Panel members
- Tribunal Member Sinclair, Tribunal Member Knight
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Harrington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at Southampton by CVP on 4 October 2023 before Employment Judge Scott with Tribunal Members Sinclair and Knight, found in favour of Mrs Harrington on a series of disability discrimination claims against Scrivens Ltd. The judgment records that direct discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, indirect discrimination, and disability-related harassment each succeeded in part, and that the failure to make reasonable adjustments claim was well founded and succeeded.
The Tribunal also held that it was just and equitable to extend time so that conduct from 4 January 2021 was within time, but only to the extent of factual conduct that was not disputed. The supplied judgment text does not record any monetary award or split remedy, so no compensation figure is extracted from this decision text.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | No sex discrimination claim is set out in the supplied judgment text. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination under s13 Equality Act 2010 succeeded in part. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability under s15 Equality Act 2010 succeeded in part. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect discrimination under s19 Equality Act 2010 succeeded in part. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments under ss20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 was found well founded and succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Disability-related harassment under s26 Equality Act 2010 succeeded in part. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s13 Equality Act 2010
- s15 Equality Act 2010
- s19 Equality Act 2010
- ss20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- s26 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.