Case 1402442/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Mr N Henry (Consultant) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402442/2020
- Decision date
- 26 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Exeter by video before Employment Judge Smail, dismissed Mr S Davis's unfair dismissal claim. The short judgment records the dismissal of that claim and does not set out any fuller merits reasoning or any legal test by name.
The judgment also records, by consent, an arrangement on the claim for unauthorised deductions from earnings. That claim was to be treated as dismissed on 18 June 2021 unless the claimant restored it beforehand if the respondent did not pay £400 within 14 days. The payment was agreed without prejudice to liability, so the judgment records a conditional settlement arrangement rather than a merits determination on that claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the claim was to be treated as dismissed on 18 June 2021 unless restored before then if the respondent did not pay £400 within 14 days; the payment was agreed without prejudice to liability. | Settled | — | £400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £400
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.