Case 1402489/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Jermolajeva v Anaya Corporation Ltd (in voluntary creditors’ liquidation) and Mr T Armes — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402489/2019
- Decision date
- 4 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that Miss V Jermolajeva brought claims of sexual harassment and victimisation against Anaya Corporation Ltd (in voluntary creditors’ liquidation) and Mr T Armes. Employment Judge C H O’Rourke heard the case at Bristol by video on 28 January 2021, with the claimant appearing in person, the first respondent not attending or being represented, and the second respondent represented by Ms K McManus.
The tribunal dismissed both claims. The written record states that the claimant’s claims of sexual harassment and victimisation failed and were dismissed. The record also notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment records this as a claim of sexual harassment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.