Case 1402529/2018 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402529/2018
- Decision date
- 24 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emerton Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Emerton, sitting alone at Southampton on 21-24 September 2020, determined Mr F Bernal's claims against Lush Manufacturing Limited. The written judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded.
The tribunal also recorded that the direct race discrimination claims were not well founded, and that the harassment claims related to race were not well founded. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the written decision.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted text therefore contains the outcome only, without a written explanation of the factual findings or legal analysis behind those outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.