Case 1402531/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Bird v Ramboll UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402531/2018
- Decision date
- 1 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Members
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr N A Knight, Mr J Shah
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Bird
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAfter a hearing at Southampton on 10-12 September 2019 before Employment Judge Reed and lay members Mr N A Knight and Mr J Shah, the Tribunal unanimously rejected the claimant's claims. It found that Mr S Bird had not been unlawfully discriminated against by Ramboll UK Ltd on the grounds of disability, age or sex, and that he had not been harassed by the respondent.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The judgment records no monetary award and no split of remedy between claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.