Case 1402549/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. J Apuhin v Welford Healthcare Ltd and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 1402549/2024
- Decision date
- 4 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Salter Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs. J Apuhin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend and was not represented at the hearing. The respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The tribunal found that the claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, detriments on grounds of protected disclosures, unpaid holiday pay and unlawful deduction from wages were presented out of time in circumstances where it was reasonably practicable to have presented them in time.
The tribunal also found that the complaints of discrimination, harassment and victimisation concerning disability, pregnancy and maternity, and marriage or civil partnership were presented out of time and were not presented within such other period as the tribunal considered just and equitable. Accordingly, the claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
10 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Presented out of time where it was reasonably practicable to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Presented out of time where it was reasonably practicable to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment described this as detriments on grounds of protected disclosures and found it was presented out of time where it was reasonably practicable to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Presented out of time where it was reasonably practicable to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Presented out of time where it was reasonably practicable to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The discrimination complaint concerning disability was presented out of time and was not presented within such other period as the tribunal considered just and equitable. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.