Case 1402556/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O O’Connor v Tendable Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402556/2022
- Decision date
- 21 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O O’Connor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningLiability was not contested. The tribunal held that Mr O’Connor had been unfairly dismissed by Tendable Limited and that his complaint of detriment for alleging infringement of the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 was well founded. No reasons were separately set out in the extracted text, but the judgment records these liability findings and then turns to remedy.
On the unfair dismissal claim, the parties agreed the basic award, loss of earnings, and loss of employer pension contributions. The tribunal recorded an agreed basic award of £1,713.00, agreed loss of earnings of £22,955.84 net, and £2,354.15 gross for loss of employer pension contributions. The separate claim for a payment in respect of share options was dismissed. The unfair dismissal award totalled £27,022.99.
On the detriment claim, the tribunal awarded £7,000 for injury to feelings and £507.84 interest, producing a total of £7,507.84 on that claim. The tribunal then applied a 10% uplift because the respondent was in breach of the ACAS Code of Practice in respect of grievance procedures and it was just and equitable to increase the award by that amount.
The tribunal recorded total sums due of £34,530.83 before uplift, added 10% of £3,453.08, and stated that the total payable before grossing up was £37,983.08. It then grossed up the taxable part of the award, noting that the injury to feelings award and related interest, loss of earnings, and pension contributions totalled £35,628.93, with £30,000 tax-free and £5,628.93 taxable. The grossed-up taxable amount was £9,381.55, including £3,752.62 income tax, giving a final amount payable of £41,735.70. The annex records a monetary award of £41,735.70 and a prescribed element of £22,955.84 for the period 31 May 2022 to 11 April 2023.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair. Remedy for this claim comprised an agreed basic award of £1,713.00, agreed loss of earnings of £22,955.84 net, and £2,354.15 gross in respect of loss of employer pension contributions. The separate claim for a payment in respect of share options was dismissed. | Upheld | — | £27,023 |
| Part-time worker regulations | The complaint that the claimant was subjected to detriment because he alleged that the respondent infringed the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 was well founded. Remedy was £7,000 for injury to feelings plus £507.84 interest. | Upheld | — | £7,508 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £41,736
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,713
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £25,310
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000
- ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures 2015
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.