Case 1402682/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Washbrook v OCS Group UK Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1402682/2022
- Decision date
- 3 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Washbrook
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint described as breach of contract, linked to the respondent not responding to a grievance as part of a disciplinary process, failing to follow a proper investigation process, and failing to supply requested documents. The respondent resisted the claim and applied to strike it out on the basis that the claimant's employment was continuing, so the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear a breach of contract claim.
The tribunal explained that its contractual jurisdiction is governed by section 3 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 and the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994. It recorded that, for an employee's contractual claim to be heard, the claim must arise or be outstanding on termination of employment and seek damages, recovery of a sum due, or recovery of a sum under an enactment relating to the contract.
The parties confirmed that the claimant remained employed by the respondent. The claimant's representative acknowledged that, with employment continuing and no constructive dismissal asserted, the matter was outside the tribunal's jurisdiction. The tribunal therefore dismissed the breach of contract complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal dismissed the breach of contract complaint because it was outside the Employment Tribunal's jurisdiction while the claimant's employment was continuing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 3 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- Article 3 of the Order
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.