Case 1402709/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Weller v Wessex Broadcasting Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1402709/2018
- Decision date
- 9 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Members
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr P Bompass, Mr N A Knight
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Weller
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Weller worked for Wessex Broadcasting Ltd from February 2014 and was diagnosed with Crohn’s disease shortly after starting, which the Company accepted made her disabled. She later complained about disability discrimination, and the tribunal noted that on 4 December 2017 the parties entered into a settlement agreement dealing with claims including disability discrimination and that she left the Company.
After Mrs Weller began working for Lifestyle Media in early 2018, Ms McManus informed Mr Simmonds of that fact. On 14 March 2018 Mr Simmonds sent an email stating that, save for limited exceptions, the Company would no longer deal with agencies but only with clients direct. The tribunal found that Mr Simmonds knew of Mrs Weller’s earlier discrimination complaint, did not accept his evidence that he was unaware of it, and concluded that the real reason for the March 2018 email was the allegation of discrimination made against him. The tribunal therefore upheld the victimisation claim under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010.
The alternative harassment claim failed. Although the tribunal found the conduct was unwanted and related to disability, it was not satisfied that the purpose or effect test for harassment under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 was met, and Mrs Weller had not given evidence that it had that effect.
On remedy, the tribunal rejected the claim for about £4,000 lost commission because the evidence was too uncertain to support an award. It accepted Mrs Weller’s evidence on injury to feelings, finding that the impact on her career, reputation, health and confidence was serious and long-lasting, and awarded £20,000 for injury to feelings plus £2,400 interest at 8% for eighteen months, giving a total award of £22,400.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The tribunal found that Mrs Weller had done a protected act by complaining about disability discrimination, that Mr Simmonds knew of it, and that the 14 March 2018 email changing the Company’s approach to agencies was a detriment imposed because of that complaint. The tribunal awarded £20,000 for injury to feelings, with interest dealt with separately. | Upheld | Disability | £20,000 |
| Harassment | The tribunal accepted that the 14 March 2018 direction was unwanted conduct related to disability, but was not satisfied that it had the purpose or effect required for harassment under the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,400
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.27 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.