Case 1402727/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Cohen v Hampshire County Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 1402727/2021
- Decision date
- 5 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Cohen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant failed to comply with an Unless Order dated 30 July 2024. As a result, the claims were struck out on 14 August 2024 as an administrative action, and the judgment confirmed the dismissal of all claims.
The judgment also stated that, under Rule 38(2) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the claimant may apply to have the order set aside if it is just and equitable to do so. It further recorded that all future hearings were vacated.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refers only to 'the Claims' and does not list individual causes of action; claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers only to 'the Claims' and does not list individual causes of action; claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories. | Struck out | — | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment refers only to 'the Claims' and does not list individual causes of action; claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment refers only to 'the Claims' and does not list individual causes of action; claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers only to 'the Claims' and does not list individual causes of action; claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment refers only to 'the Claims' and does not list individual causes of action; claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories. | Struck out | Sex |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38(2) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.