Case 1402887/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Crammond (Counsel) For the v Ms I Ferber (King’s Counsel) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1402887/2019
- Decision date
- 24 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emerton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Crammond (Counsel) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Southampton by CVP video before Employment Judge Emerton sitting alone. The claimant was Mr S Fernandes, and the respondents were Liverpool Victoria General Insurance Group Limited and Liverpool Victoria Friendly Society Limited. The written record states that the claimant was given leave to amend his claim to bring a claim of unauthorised deduction of wages.
The judgment records that the claims against the second respondent were dismissed upon withdrawal. It also records that the age discrimination claims were dismissed upon withdrawal and that the breach of contract claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No reasons are given in the written record for those withdrawals, and no further findings are set out for those claims.
The tribunal found that the claim of unauthorised deduction of wages against the first respondent was well founded. It ordered the first respondent to pay the claimant compensation of £60,200.00. The judgment states that the sum may be liable for lawful deductions for tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claim against the first respondent was well founded and ordered compensation of £60,200.00. | Upheld | — | £60,200 |
| Age discrimination | The age discrimination claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the claims against the second respondent were dismissed upon withdrawal, but it does not specify a separate legal label beyond the withdrawn claims already listed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £60,200
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £60,200
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.