Case 1402949/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Mandy Mikhael v Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 1402949/2020
- Decision date
- 29 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lowe Representation-
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Mandy Mikhael
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in Mrs Mandy Mikhael's race discrimination case against Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. The claimant had worked for the respondent as an occupational therapist from December 2016, resigned on 4 December 2018, and left employment on 5 February 2019. The pleaded claims were direct discrimination on the grounds of race, harassment and victimisation. The tribunal also noted that some matters in the Scott Schedule went beyond the claim form and there was no application to amend to include them.
The issue was whether time should be extended under section 123 Equality Act 2010. Applying the approach in Robertson v Bexley Community Centre and Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan, the tribunal held that the claimant had not shown that it was just and equitable to extend time. It found that the claimant had the material facts by the December 2018 stage 2 capability meeting, including the record-keeping concerns and the documents that formed the HCPC referral bundle, and that no new allegations were later made to the HCPC.
The tribunal rejected the claimant's arguments based on late discovery of the HCPC material, the fact that she had to deal with the regulatory proceedings, intermittent ill-health, lack of prejudice to the respondent, and overall fairness. It found the delay substantial, with the earliest matters dating from 2017 and most from 2018, and held that the passage of time would materially prejudice the respondent because witnesses would need to be traced and asked to recall events from several years earlier. The tribunal concluded that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claims and dismissed the direct race discrimination, harassment and victimisation claims as out of time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed at a preliminary hearing as presented out of time under section 123 Equality Act 2010; the tribunal held the claimant knew the material facts by December 2018 and refused to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed at a preliminary hearing as presented out of time under section 123 Equality Act 2010; the tribunal held the claimant knew the material facts by December 2018 and refused to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Dismissed at a preliminary hearing as presented out of time under section 123 Equality Act 2010; the tribunal held the claimant knew the material facts by December 2018 and refused to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre [2003] IRLR 434
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan UKEAT/0305/13
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.