Case 1403041/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Green v Lidl Great Britain Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403041/2018
- Decision date
- 27 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings brought by Mr E Green against Lidl Great Britain Limited were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
No findings on the merits of the claims or on remedy are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The gov.uk listing category identifies breach of contract; the judgment itself records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The gov.uk listing category identifies disability discrimination; the judgment itself records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The gov.uk listing category identifies public interest disclosure; the judgment itself records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The gov.uk listing category identifies unfair dismissal; the judgment itself records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.