Case 1403075/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403075/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H Lumby
- Panel members
- C Lloyd-Jennings, E Smillie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Southampton by CVP from 13 to 17 November 2023, the tribunal sat before Employment Judge H Lumby with C Lloyd-Jennings and E Smillie. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The tribunal gave an oral judgment and recorded that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed, so the unfair dismissal claims were dismissed.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's discrimination claims were dismissed. The published record does not set out further written reasons or any monetary award, and it notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records dismissal of the claimant's discrimination claims without specifying the sub-heads in the text provided; GOV.UK tags the decision as Disability Discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.