Case 1403363/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Thorn v Lidl Great Britain Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1403363/2023
- Decision date
- 16 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Thorn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 8 March 2024 giving her an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Roper therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued; the unfair dismissal classification comes from the gov.uk listing category rather than reasons in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued; the sex discrimination classification comes from the gov.uk listing category rather than reasons in the judgment text. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.