Case 1403381/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Westcarr v Calcot Health and Leisure Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403381/2018
- Decision date
- 6 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Westcarr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Bristol, Employment Judge Maxwell heard the case on 22, 23 and 24 July 2019 and 5 and 6 September 2019. The claimant, Mrs S Westcarr, appeared in person and the respondent, Calcot Health and Leisure Limited, was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that the claimant's claims of harassment and direct discrimination were not well-founded and were dismissed. The extracted text does not set out separate findings of fact or a fuller explanation of the reasoning beyond that conclusion.
No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The extracted judgment does not specify the protected characteristic. Classified as age-related from the case listing/context. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states 'direct discrimination' but does not restate the protected characteristic in the extracted text; classified as age discrimination from the case listing/context. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.