Case 1403529/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Mr R. Chaudhry — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403529/2020
- Decision date
- 28 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Smith brought disability discrimination claims against Royal Mail Group Ltd in the Employment Tribunal at Exeter. The judgment records that the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr R. Chaudhry, solicitor.
The tribunal's decision was that the claimant's disability discrimination claims failed and were dismissed. The extracted judgment text does not set out the tribunal's detailed findings or the legal reasoning, but it states that full oral reasons were given at the hearing on 15 October 2021.
No monetary award is recorded in the extracted judgment text. The only outcome stated is dismissal of the disability discrimination claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's disability discrimination claims failed and were dismissed. The extracted text does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasoning; full oral reasons were given at the hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.