Case 1403634/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Buckley v St Mungo's — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403634/2019
- Decision date
- 22 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Buckley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short rule 52 withdrawal judgment in case 1403634/2019. It records that Mrs C Buckley brought proceedings against St Mungo's and that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment is dated 22 November 2019 and is signed by Employment Judge Cadney Date.
No findings on liability, remedy, or the substance of the pleaded claims are set out in the judgment text. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-time worker regulations | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The short judgment does not set out the pleaded claim particulars, so the claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The short judgment does not set out the pleaded claim particulars, so the claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The short judgment does not set out the pleaded claim particulars, so the claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.