Case 1403646/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P McCabe v Allianz Management Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1403646/2019
- Decision date
- 30 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P McCabe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Livesey Date issued a rule 52 withdrawal judgment on 30 October 2019. The record states that the proceedings in Mr P McCabe's case against Allianz Management Services Limited were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
The judgment does not set out any merits findings, liability findings, or remedy. On the extracted case context, the claim categories were breach of contract, redundancy pay, and unfair dismissal, but the written judgment itself gives no separate analysis of those heads because the case ended on withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not give a separate merits decision on this head of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The written judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not give a separate merits decision on this head of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not give a separate merits decision on this head of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.