Case 1403805/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Khan v OCS Group UK Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403805/2023
- Decision date
- 13 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leverton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr M Khan's unfair dismissal claim under rule 37. In a letter dated 25 October 2023, the Tribunal gave him an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success because he had less than the two years' employment required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring an unfair dismissal claim. The judgment records that he failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, in response to that invitation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 after the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity to make written representations. The judgment says the claim had no reasonable prospect of success because the Claimant had less than two years' employment required under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and he failed to make sufficient representations against strike out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.