Case 1403872/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Park v Bristol City Council — 2022
- Case reference
- 1403872/2020
- Decision date
- 1 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Ms Y Ramsaran, Ms L Simpson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Park
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Bristol before Employment Judge J Bax with Ms Y Ramsaran and Ms L Simpson, heard the case from 21 to 24 February 2022. The written judgment records that Mr R Park's claims of detriment for making protected disclosures against Bristol City Council were dismissed.
No separate remedy figure is recorded in the written judgment, and the document states that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing. It also records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's notice, so the written record contains only the outcome and not the tribunal's full reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the claims of detriment for making protected disclosures were dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; the written record does not set them out. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.