Case 1403875/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Pratten v Severnwye Farm Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403875/2018
- Decision date
- 15 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Ms S Maidment, Ms G Meehan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Pratten
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Bristol Employment Tribunal, Mrs J Pratten's unlawful deductions from wages claim was recorded as dismissed following its withdrawal on 3 June 2019. The written record states that the tribunal gave its reasons orally at the hearing and that no written reasons will be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal dismissed the claims of automatically unfair dismissal and detriment arising from a protected disclosure under s.103A and s.47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also dismissed the corresponding claims relating to the raising of health and safety concerns under s.100 and s.44 of the same Act.
The direct sex discrimination claim and the harassment claim on the grounds of sex were also dismissed. The judgment records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal on 3 June 2019. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Automatically unfair dismissal claim for making a protected disclosure under s.103A ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Automatically unfair dismissal claim for raising health and safety concerns under s.100 ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Detriment claim for making a protected disclosure under s.47B ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Detriment claim for raising health and safety concerns under s.44 ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination claim dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Harassment claim on the grounds of sex dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.103A ERA 1996
- s.100 ERA 1996
- s.47B ERA 1996
- s.44 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.