Mrs C Robinson v T J Morris Ltd — 2019

Case reference: 1403901/2019
Decision date: 9 December 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Midgley Date

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs C Robinson

Respondent

T J Morris Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment is a rule 52 judgment on withdrawal. It records that the claimant withdrew the claim and that the proceedings were dismissed following that withdrawal.

No findings on the merits of the underlying complaints are set out, and no remedy or monetary award is recorded.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The specific claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category, not from detail in the judgment text.	Withdrawn	—	—
Breach of contract	The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The specific claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category, not from detail in the judgment text.	Withdrawn	—	—
Part-time worker regulations	The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The specific claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category, not from detail in the judgment text.	Withdrawn	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.