Case 1403904/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Hammond v Sunseeker International Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403904/2021
- Decision date
- 15 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray AND
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr Flanagan, Ms Lloyd-Jennings
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Hammond
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Southampton from 27 February to 1 March 2023 before Employment Judge Gray, sitting with Mr Flanagan and Ms Lloyd-Jennings. The unanimous judgment disposed of three complaints brought by Mr L Hammond against Sunseeker International Limited: harassment, discrimination arising from disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments.
The tribunal recorded that the harassment complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. It further held that the complaints of discrimination arising from disability and failure in the duty to make reasonable adjustments failed and were dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment records that the harassment complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure in the duty to make reasonable adjustments dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.