Case 1403911/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Gumbrell v Bournemouth International Airport Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1403911/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Gumbrell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 24 February 2020 before Employment Judge Gray in Southampton, the claimant, Miss C Gumbrell, was represented by her mother and the respondent was represented by counsel. The tribunal recorded that the claimant orally withdrew her unfair dismissal complaint during the course of the hearing, and that complaint was dismissed.
The tribunal also dealt with an allegation of harassment by a third party on 28 June 2019 against Bournemouth International Airport Ltd. That allegation was struck out pursuant to Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant orally withdrew the unfair dismissal complaint during the preliminary hearing on 24 February 2020, and the tribunal dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal struck out the allegation of harassment by a third party on 28 June 2019 against the respondent under Rule 37(1)(a). | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.