Case 1403994/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Kelly v Sunrise UK Operations Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1403994/2019
- Decision date
- 3 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley
- Panel members
- Mrs Christine Lloyd-Jennings, Mr Geoff Crowe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Kelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard this case on 8, 9 and 10 November 2021 at Bristol by video hearing before Employment Judge Midgley, Mrs Christine Lloyd-Jennings and Mr Geoff Crowe. The claimant was represented by Mr I Wheaton, Counsel, and the respondent by Mr Chadwick, Consultant.
The written judgment states only that the tribunal unanimously found the claimant's claims were not well founded and dismissed them. The short written record does not set out the underlying findings of fact or the legal reasoning, and it records that reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
No monetary remedy is recorded in the written judgment. The record also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sent judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were not well founded and were dismissed. The specific claim type is taken from the case listing and Layer 1 context, not from the short written judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were not well founded and were dismissed. The specific claim type is taken from the case listing and Layer 1 context, not from the short written judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.