Case 1404007/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mrs L Treadwell, Respondent’s Legal Dept — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404007/2021
- Decision date
- 3 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing held in chambers at Plymouth on 2 August 2022, Employment Judge N J Roper recorded that Mrs Donna Blake's claims for discriminatory dismissal on the grounds of race and for harassment related to race were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment is a short disposal decision rather than a merits determination.
The tribunal also stated that this disposal did not affect the claimant's remaining claims, which were said to be dealt with in the attached Case Management Summary of the same date. No substantive findings on liability or remedy are set out in the extracted judgment text beyond the fact of withdrawal and dismissal of those two race-related claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's claim for discriminatory dismissal on the grounds of race was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. It states that this does not affect the claimant's remaining claims as explained in the attached Case Management Summary of the same date. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records that the claimant's claim for harassment related to race was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. It states that this does not affect the claimant's remaining claims as explained in the attached Case Management Summary of the same date. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.