Case 1404110/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Williams v Asda Stores Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1404110/2023
- Decision date
- 10 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr G Williams brought an unfair dismissal claim against ASDA Stores Limited. At the Bristol video hearing on 19 December 2023, Employment Judge Ferguson held that the claim had not been presented within the applicable time limit, but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time.
The tribunal found that the claim was presented within a further reasonable period and therefore allowed it to proceed to a final hearing. This decision did not determine the substantive merits of the unfair dismissal claim and did not record any monetary award; notice of the final hearing was to be sent in due course.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary limitation ruling only; the tribunal decided the claim could proceed and did not determine the merits. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- within a further reasonable period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.