Case 1404149/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Crane v Georgia Rose Residential Care Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404149/2021
- Decision date
- 5 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Crane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 26 October 2021 and the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No discrimination or unfair dismissal findings are recorded in the judgment text provided; the tribunal instead entered a default judgment on the monetary claims pleaded.
The tribunal found that Georgia Rose Residential Care Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mrs J Crane’s wages and ordered payment of £1,855.78 gross. It also found that she had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,494.80 in damages for notice pay. In addition, the tribunal found that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,234.50.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,611.75. The total sum awarded was £10,196.83, payable within 14 days. The judgment does not set out any separate breakdown for interest or other remedy components beyond the individual monetary awards and the final total.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under rule 21; tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,856 |
| Breach of contract | Default judgment under rule 21; tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £2,495 |
| Redundancy | Default judgment under rule 21; tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £4,235 |
| Holiday pay | Default judgment under rule 21; tribunal found holiday entitlement had not been paid. | Upheld | — | £1,612 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,197
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.