Case 1404183/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Case Number: 1404183/2023 SOUTH-WEST EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Mr J Adams v Heard at — 2024
- Case reference
- 1404183/2023
- Decision date
- 13 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Craft
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Case Number: 1404183/2023 SOUTH-WEST EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Mr J Adams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the Claimant, Mr J Adams, was unfairly dismissed by the Respondent, Park Leisure Solutions Ltd. The Tribunal also found that the Claimant's conduct contributed to his dismissal and directed that any compensatory award be reduced by fifty percent on account of that contributory fault.
On remedy, the Respondent was ordered to pay a Basic Award of £2,442.76 and a compensatory award limited to £500 for loss of statutory rights, reduced to £250 by reason of the Claimant's contributory fault. The Tribunal further found that the Respondent had wrongfully dismissed the Claimant and ordered payment of £2,442.76 in respect of pay in lieu of notice to which he was contractually entitled.
The Recoupment Regulations were stated not to apply to the compensatory award. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded as payment in lieu of notice to which the Claimant was contractually entitled. | Upheld | — | £2,443 |
| Unfair dismissal | Basic Award of £2,442.76 plus a compensatory award limited to £500 for loss of statutory rights, reduced by 50% to £250 for contributory fault. Tribunal found the Claimant's conduct contributed to his dismissal. | Upheld | — | £2,693 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,136
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,443
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £250
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.