Case 1404230/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G L Lawson v Fresh Haven Healthcare Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1404230/2023
- Decision date
- 5 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
- Venue
- Bristol ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G L Lawson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Miss G L Lawson's claims against Fresh Haven Healthcare Limited at Bristol Employment Tribunal on 21, 22, 23 and 24 October 2024. It dismissed the claims of direct discrimination on grounds of disability under s.13 Equality Act 2010, discrimination arising from disability under s.15, failure to make reasonable adjustments under ss.20 and 21, and harassment on grounds of disability under s.26, recording each as not well founded.
The tribunal also dismissed the claim described as discriminatory constructive dismissal, together with the claims concerning itemised pay statements under ss.8, 11 and 12 Employment Rights Act 1996. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so this decision record contains the outcomes but no fuller written reasoning or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments under ss.20 and 21 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment on the grounds of disability under s.26 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Described in the judgment as discriminatory constructive dismissal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Other | Claims in respect of itemised pay statements under ss.8, 11 and 12 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.