Case 1404242/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Wakeling, Solicitor For the First v Freshways Dairystix Ltd (In Voluntary Creditors’ Liquidation) and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 1404242/2018
- Decision date
- 2 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr R Wakeling, Solicitor For the First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard a protective award claim brought by 27 claimants. It accepted evidence from Mrs Katheryn Pollard and a statement from Mrs Maria Triston, noted that no one attended for the first respondent, and recorded that the second respondent had provided written submissions. The first respondent, Freshways Dairystix Limited, manufactured packaged dairy products at Holland Road, Langage Business Park, Plympton, Plymouth.
The tribunal found that approximately 17 employees were dismissed as redundant on 19 July 2018 and approximately 30 more on 26 July 2018, making 47 redundancies in total. It found there was no recognised independent trade union, no elected employee representatives, and no adequate consultation before the dismissals. Applying section 188 of TULRCA, the tribunal held that the respondent had failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements for proposals to dismiss 20 or more employees at one establishment within 90 days or less.
On that basis, the tribunal made a protective award for all 27 claimants listed on the schedule, who were dismissed as redundant on 19 July 2018 or 26 July 2018. It ordered remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on the relevant dismissal date, and stated that each employee was entitled to an award for 90 days irrespective of the date their employment ended. The first respondent entered voluntary creditors' liquidation on 21 August 2018.
The tribunal also dealt with remaining claims for breach of contract, unfair dismissal, accrued but unpaid holiday pay, and failure to issue a written statement of particulars of employment. Those claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimants, subject to the tribunal's direction that the dismissal would take effect 21 days after the judgment was sent unless written representations were received before then.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award under s.188 TULRCA. The tribunal found the complaint well founded and ordered remuneration for a protected period of 90 days for each of the 27 claimants, but the judgment does not state a cash figure or split the award into monetary amounts. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimants, effective 21 days after the judgment was sent unless written representations were received before that date. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimants, effective 21 days after the judgment was sent unless written representations were received before that date. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimants, effective 21 days after the judgment was sent unless written representations were received before that date. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | This was the claim for failure by the respondent to issue a written statement of particulars of employment. It was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimants, effective 21 days after the judgment was sent unless written representations were received before that date. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.188 TULRCA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.