Case 1404540/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Kathryn Weston v AND Heidi Louise Morgan Trading as Curae Home Care — 2020
- Case reference
- 1404540/2019
- Decision date
- 12 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Kathryn Weston
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal sat in chambers at Plymouth on 18 March 2020. The judgment records that the time for presenting a response had expired and that no valid response had been presented, so judgment was entered under Rule 21.
Miss Kathryn Weston’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded, and the respondent, Heidi Louise Morgan trading as Curae Home Care, was ordered to pay £1,477.00 gross. Her claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay also succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £541.54 gross.
The judgment states that the parties did not need to attend a remedy hearing. The total sums recorded in the judgment are £1,477.00 and £541.54, making a combined award of £2,018.54 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeding under Rule 21; respondent ordered to pay gross sum of £1,477.00. | Upheld | — | £1,477 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but unpaid holiday pay; respondent ordered to pay gross sum of £541.54. | Upheld | — | £542 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,019
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.