Case 1404635/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Mr P Morgan of Counsel For the first v C1 Realisations (2020) Limited (In Administration) and 2 others — 2022

Case reference: 1404635/2020
Decision date: 8 July 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

4 named

Claimant

Mr P Morgan of Counsel For the first

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal held that the claimant, who was dismissed as redundant on 28 April 2020, was entitled to a protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It found the application well founded and ordered the first respondent to pay remuneration calculated under section 190 of the 1992 Act for the claimant's protected period.

The protected period was fixed at 90 days, running from 28 April 2020 to 27 July 2020. The judgment states that the award relates only to the claimant. It also records that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 apply, including the postponement and recoupment provisions.

The tribunal further stated that the second respondent, the Secretary of State, ought to pay to the claimant such amount of the protective award as falls within the statutory guarantee provisions in Part XII of the Employment Rights Act 1996. No monetary sum is set out in the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment does not state a monetary figure. It records that the second respondent ought to pay such amount of the protective award as falls within the statutory guarantee provisions in Part XII of the Employment Rights Act 1996.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

4 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.