Case 1404866/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Roberts v Gloucestershire County Council — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404866/2021
- Decision date
- 26 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Roberts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Ms L Roberts's claim against Gloucestershire County Council. It recorded that, by letter dated 12 July 2022, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out. The hearing listed for 7 to 8 September 2022 was vacated and did not take place. No substantive merits findings or remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 12 July 2022 to make representations or request a hearing, but she did not do so or did not do so sufficiently. No merits determination was made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.