Case 1404972/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Butler v Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404972/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Butler
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment, not a merits decision. The Tribunal recorded that by letter dated 4 December 2020 it gave Ms Butler an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with Tribunal orders and/or the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not identify any substantive findings on liability, and it does not record any monetary remedy.
The Tribunal also stated that the hearing listed for 22 to 26 February 2021 would not take place. The decision is dated 8 January 2021 and was sent to the parties on 20 January 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for failure to comply with Tribunal orders and/or failure to actively pursue the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.